Today I cataloged 62 more cards of drawer 6 of the sheet music collection project. Row 368's title field - I'm not sure if Independence Day should be capitalized or not (I assumed yes since it's a proper holiday, Jeanette, please let me know if this is incorrect and needs changing). Row 349 had a note saying "Includes U. S. marine air corps version." I'm not sure if marine air corps. needs to be capitalized (it was on the card) or if it belongs in a note field as opposed to some other field but to me it looks like it belongs in the note field and wouldn't need capitalization of those words. Again, Jeanette, please let me know if this is wrong. Everything else was mostly routine; per my comment last week, I've started to put the "arranged by" information in the arranger column/field instead of the 245 statement of responsibility field. Also, the title in row 394 includes words describing the type of music it is "lullaby fox trot" - not sure if this should stay in this field or be moved to the instrumentation or note field. Please let me know if you have any thoughts on this. Thanks!
Friday, February 13, 2015
Friday, February 6, 2015
Shab, sheet music collection project, 2/6/2015
Today I cataloged 80 more cards from drawer 6 of the sheet music collection project. Here are the questions/issues I have this week: 1) one card (row 330) says "composed by xxxx and arranged for orchestra by xxxx". I'm uncertain if this information belongs in the 245 field (I suspect not, though that is where I put it for now) or should be put in the co-composer and arranger fields instead. Please let me know. Similarly, another card (row 287) had a "translated by xxxx" on it. Again, I'm not sure if this belongs in the 245 field - is there a field for translators of foreign language music? 2) The J.C. Penney bicentennial music cards are coming up again (row 314) so please let me know what you think about that row. 3) Also in row 287 was a peculiar language note which I've put in the languages (546) field for now. Could you please review it and let me know what you think and if it's done correctly/belongs in the right place. Thanks!
Friday, January 30, 2015
Shab, sheet music collection project, 1/30/2015
Today I cataloged 79 more cards of drawer 6 of the sheet music collection project. There are more spelling discrepancies to check against the hard copy music upstairs (highlighted in red and yellow). Jeanette, could you please also let me know what you think of the title for card/row 230 because it's confusing and I'm not sure if the whole of that info belongs there or also somewhere else. I've changed the spreadsheet, per your request, to take the brackets and "n.d." out of the date/leader field, but it's still going to be on the previous spreadsheets because I didn't know about the mistake then. Otherwise, the only question I have is what to do with information on the card that's not really instrumentation info per se, but more like a description of what the music is for, such as "two step" or "hesitation waltz song" (rows 199 and 231). I don't know if they're supposed to be in the instrumentation field or note field or some other (for now I've put them in the note field; please let me know if this is incorrect and needs to be changed). Thanks!
Friday, January 23, 2015
Shab, sheet music collection project, 1/23/2015
Today I cataloged 70 more cards of drawer 6 of the sheet music collection. Jeanette, could you please look at the card associated with row 139 (I've highlighted the whole row in red) - the information on this card was very unusual and all over the place. I did my best but there were several pieces of information which I didn't know where they would go, if they go anywhere at all. Otherwise, no particularly new questions came up. I am confused occasionally about where certain pieces of information go if they're not in the field where they normally belong; for example, row 149: the card says it's "transcribed for cello and piano by..." etc. I'm not sure if all that needs to be in the title field and whether or not it goes there, if that information should be elsewhere too (like the note field?) It is another statement of responsibility piece of information (I think?) because the transcriber's name is given but there's no field on the spreadsheet for a transcriber. Jeanette, please let me know your thoughts on this so I can fix it if need be. Thanks!
Friday, January 16, 2015
Shab, sheet music collection project, 1/16/21016
Today I managed to catalog 70 cards of drawer 6 of the sheet music collection project. No real issues were brought up except a few of the cards (highlighted in red and yellow on the spreadsheet) will need to be checked against the hard copy music upstairs since the spelling of the names were contradictory and I couldn't figure out the correct spellings from researching on Google. This is rows 47 and 48 and 85 and 86. Everything else was routine.
Friday, December 19, 2014
Shab, sheet music collection project, 12/19/2014
Today I managed to finish drawer 5 and start drawer 6 of the sheet music collection project. Jeanette, there are some fields highlighted in red in the drawer 5 spreadsheet and also some note fields highlighted in red in the drawer 6 spreadsheet. Could you please review those to see if they are correct once you have time. Thanks!
Friday, December 12, 2014
Shab, sheet music collection project, 12/12/2014
Today I cataloged 68 more cards of drawer 5 of the sheet music collection project. Most of the questions I have I've asked before (caption title, etc.) I'm now starting to see cards, usually the foreign language ones, where there's what looks like another title(??) in brackets above the regular title in its field; Jeanette, if you need to, please remind me to show you a sample card next week. I'm not sure what to do about this because it's confusing to have both the title and this information printed in that way on the same card. (The card for row 1150 is like that, I believe, and that entire card is full of confusing bits of information, so I've highlighted it in red). I'm also wondering if an arranger is mentioned such as "arranged by so and so" (row 1159 for example) or if the word "arranger" is mentioned next to the name on the card, should that name be in the arranger's column/field on the spreadsheet instead of the composer's field or the 246/"words by..." field? Jeanette, please let me know your thoughts on this. Thanks!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)